Summer 2006 Magazine

News Story :: 2006-11-30 14:21:23

THEY ARE HOMES BUILDING BLOCKS OF NEIGHBOURHOODS CORNERSTONES OF COMMUNITIES

When it comes to the problems surrounding ‘studentification’, and HMOs, most of what gets talked about, and shown, is the nuisance: litter, rubbish, persistent, usually low level, often thoughtless, anti-social behaviour.

Houses are More than Bricks Mortar Money - Investment Opportunities For Developers & Buy-To-Let/Second Home Speculators

However, it’s possible to clean up streets, get rid of litter, and curb the worst excesses of landlords and their tenants. But none of this is going to make neighbourhoods capable of sustaining and renewing themselves.

That needs people who are prepared to put down roots, feel responsibility for, and to, their neighbours, and, ultimately, contribute to the long term health and future of the greater community. In other words, people for whom houses are first and foremost homes. People who ‘ … stay for the long haul … .’

Yes, a house is probably the single largest financial transaction most of us are likely to contemplate. The fact that the equity is likely increase over time is part of the picture. But not the whole picture.
Just as important is the neighbourhood: its location, its amenities, the people – its ‘ambiance’.

We invest in a house and make it a home. We also invest in the long term viability of the neighbourhood. What happens to it and to our neighbours is important. Usually, when we move on the people who buy our home also buy into the neighbourhood and its future strength and vitality and fitness. In our neighbourhoods this isn’t happening.

Speculators buying properties for conversion to HMOs purchase a commodity that will give the maximum return on their investment They don’t even live here. So why expect them to care about the welfare of the neighbourhood?

Their tenants are young, highly mobile, totally absorbed in their own lifestyles. The houses they occupy are accommodation. Their homes are elsewhere. Their commitment to our neighbourhoods is minimal and transient. Their time as investors in homes and neighbourhoods is yet to come.
The danger is that council, universities, students all concentrate on cleaning up the environment ‘… bailing out the Titanic’s engine room with teaspoons …’ and put aside the fact that there are: too many HMOs, too few families, not enough children, degraded amenities. They must not ignore the social and emotional misery of the real people living in the host communities who are at risk of becoming aliens in the dying neighbourhoods that were once their own.

In our neighbourhoods families and others don’t want to, or are prevented from, making a commitment to the ‘long haul’. That has to change. How to do it is the real challenge – for council, universities, students [landlords] and, ultimately, for Government itself.

Rise to it and there is some hope that we will again have

—Neighbourhoods where families want to live … not leave!—

Read The NAG Wish List

The NAG Wish List

2010-07-02 12:30:17 :: LOCAL ISSUES

THE UNIVERSITIES, STUDENT UNIONS, STUDENTS & THE NEIGHBOURHOOD

The Nottingham Action Group on HMOs (NAG) organized an open meeting in March of this year with Professor Karen Cox and Stephen Dudderidge (Nottingham University) and Professor Anne Priest and Michael Lees (Nottingham Trent University).

Following on from that meeting, it was suggested that it would be useful if the NAG were to compile a ‘wish list’ of actions the universities should undertake as part of a long-term commitment to playing their role in improving those of our neighbourhoods where HMOs, their owners and their student tenants have a significant impact.

In putting together the list, advice was sought from a cross-section of NAG members, and took into account the topics raised at the March 2010 open meeting and at the large number of other NAG meetings that have taken place both before and since the Group was formally constituted in 2004.

The result is not so much a list of demands as list of those actions NAG members believe can be reasonably requested of the universities. Some are measures that can be implemented relatively fast to provide ‘quick’ wins for all parties: universities, councils, students and, of course, established residents. Others will need long-term commitment in terms of time and effort in order to achieve results. However, the NAG strongly believes that, taken together, these actions will produce lasting benefits for everyone.

1 2 3 4 5 > >>